YouTubers sue Snap over alleged AI copyright infringement
creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Snap, claiming the company used their videos without permission to train AI models.
TAGS: Snap, Artificial Intelligence, Copyright Lawsuit, YouTube, Tech News
CONTEUDO:
A group of prominent YouTube content creators has launched a legal challenge against Snap, alleging the company unauthorizedly used their videos to train artificial intelligence systems. The lawsuit, filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, marks the latest escalation in the growing conflict between tech firms and creators over AI development.

The plaintiffs represent a combined audience of roughly 6.2 million subscribers. Among the lead figures in the legal action are the creators behind the h3h3 channel, alongside the golfing-focused channels MrShortGame Golf and Golfholics. They contend that Snap utilized their proprietary video content to power features such as the “Imagine Lens,” which enables users to generate or modify images via text prompts.
Allegations of Dataset Misuse
At the center of the dispute is the claim that Snap bypassed YouTube’s terms of service and technological safeguards to scrape data. The lawsuit specifically highlights the company’s reliance on large-scale video-language datasets, including HD-VILA-100M.
The creators argue that these datasets were intended exclusively for academic and research environments, yet were exploited by Snap for commercial gain. Through this class-action suit, the plaintiffs are seeking:
- Statutory damages for the alleged infringement.
- A permanent injunction to halt the continued use of their work in AI training.
A Growing Legal Trend
This filing is part of a broader wave of litigation targeting AI model providers. Similar legal battles have already been initiated by these same plaintiffs against other industry giants, including Nvidia, Meta, and ByteDance. Data from the nonprofit Copyright Alliance indicates that more than 70 copyright infringement cases have been brought against AI companies to date.
The outcomes of these disputes have varied significantly. While some courts have ruled in favor of tech companies, such as in the case involving Meta and a group of authors, others have resulted in settlements, as seen with Anthropic. Many of these actions remain in active litigation.
Snap declined to comment on the pending litigation.